Your site is one living system.
Four Diagnostic Domains
We measure all of it.
Ground
Soil chemistry across four extraction methods (water-soluble, Mehlich, Morgan, Total Digest), metagenomic biology of bulk soil and rhizosphere. Contamination AND function in the same panel.
Water
Groundwater chemistry, surface water, produced water characterization. The primary transport pathway for most industrial contaminants and the receptor regulators care most about.
Residuals
Contamination fingerprinting: hydrocarbons, heavy metals, PFAS, salts, residuals. Concentration, distribution, speciation, and bioavailability; not just whether it's there, but whether it's moving and what's actually exposed.
Risk
Exposure pathway mapping, receptor identification, regulatory threshold comparison. Where contamination meets human health, ecological, and groundwater protection criteria; and where the closure case has to hold.
Tests built for your regulatory program.
Diagnostic scope is matched to the contamination profile, the regulatory program, and the closure pathway. A drilling pad on hydrocarbon-and-salt closure gets tested differently than a brownfield with metals and PFAS differently than a tailings pond with acid drainage. Same platform, different priorities.
Example A
Oilfield pad closureSoil chemistry + hydrocarbon panel + salt characterization + biology. Drawdown documented and soil function restoration tracked to grazing-ready endpoint.
Example B
Brownfield redevelopmentMulti-contaminant soil panel + groundwater + Rhizosphere DNA + risk assessment. Documents closure AND redevelopment-ready soil function.
Example C
Tailings reclamationHeavy metal speciation + acid generation potential + biology of disturbed substrate + water chemistry. Long-cycle stability documentation.
Example D
Produced water impact
Receiving soil chemistry + biology + salt profile + bioavailability of treated water constituents. The Eden Blue Gold gap no one else fills.
A report that holds up at every checkpoint.
The executive summary. Site boundary, sampling design, contamination summary, function metrics, risk tier, and closure pathway alignment. The page you share with your regulator, your lender, and your board.
The full baseline picture. Contamination profile, soil chemistry, biology, water, residuals, and risk-mapped data The documentation your future re-tests and closure submission get measured against.
The four diagnostic domains, each broken out with measured values, regulatory thresholds, deviation flags, and remediation interpretation. Verifier-ready charts, audit-ready data tables.
The regulatory-defense section. Sampling methodology, lab chain of custody, QA/QC protocols, statistical confidence, regulatory threshold comparison, and program-specific compliance documentation. Built so your regulator opens it, nods, and moves the file forward.
The cross-domain story. Where contamination is constraining soil function. Where water chemistry is driving receptor exposure. Where residuals are slowly mobilizing under current management. Why your site is doing what it's doing, in technical language with the data behind it.
The remediation and restoration recommendations. What to address, in what order, with what approach, on what timeline. Specific. Sequenced. Costed at project budget level. Built to close the regulatory program AND restore site value.
The closure-cycle frame. What we expect to move between sampling events. What thresholds trigger remediation adjustments. What the closure submission timeline looks like if performance tracks to projection. Set up so you can hold us, or your contractors, to predictions across the full project term.
What Comes After
Once we know what's there, we can design for a deeper fix.
You move from Diagnose into Design. We take the lab results and the goals you defined and build a remediation plan specifically for your site. What to apply, when, in what order, and why.