Your land is one living system.
Everything That Matters
We measure about all of it.
Ground
Soil chemistry across four extraction methods, metagenomic biology of bulk soil and rhizosphere. The substrate-level data that holds at framework confidence levels and supports SBTN baseline submissions.
Cover
Vegetation composition, land cover classification, plant tissue and sap chemistry. The visible layer that satellite data sees imperfectly and that field-based measurement quantifies for real.
Inputs
Audit of fertility programs, biological inputs, agrochemicals, irrigation chemistry, and supply chain claims. Verification that what's reported matches what's actually applied.
Biodiversity
Species-level inventory through eDNA, metagenomic community profiling, pollinator surveys, and functional guild analysis. The data TNFD and SBTN frameworks increasingly demand.
Tests built for your framework.
Diagnostic scope is matched to the framework you're reporting under, the materiality threshold that applies, and the audience reviewing the disclosure. A TNFD LEAP framework engagement requires different stratification than an EIA baseline differently than a foundation restoration outcome report. Same platform, framework-aligned methodology.
Example A
Corporate TNFD nature disclosureMulti-region supply chain sampling with stratified Ground + Cover + Biodiversity panels. LEAP framework methodology, audit-ready data trail.
Example B
EIA baseline studyPre-project Ground + Cover + Biodiversity baseline across project footprint and reference sites. Mitigation hierarchy decisions built from measured ecological data.
Example C
Foundation restoration programMulti-year Ground + Cover + Biodiversity monitoring across restoration parcels. Funder reporting and advocacy-grade evidence base.
Example D
SBTN baseline validation
Science-grade soil chemistry, biology, and biodiversity data for nature-positive target validation. Replaces modeled estimates with measured ground truth.
A report you can actually use.
The executive summary. Program boundary, sampling design, baseline metrics, framework alignment, and disclosure readiness assessment. The page you share with your CEO, your board, your auditor, your funder.
The full baseline picture. Soil chemistry, biology, water, plant tissue, sap, biodiversity inventory, and input audit. The documented starting point that future re-tests and outcome claims get measured against.
The four diagnostic domains, each broken out with measured values, reference ranges, framework-specific thresholds, and interpretation. Verifier-ready charts and audit-ready data tables.
The disclosure-defense section. Sampling methodology, lab chain of custody, QA/QC protocols, statistical confidence intervals, framework alignment crosswalk (TNFD LEAP, CSRD ESRS, SBTN, GRI, SASB), and the data trail your auditor will trace from raw lab result to disclosed metric.
The cross-domain story. Where soil chemistry is constraining biodiversity. Where input choices are creating supply chain risk. Where ecosystem function is degrading or recovering. Why your program is delivering what it's delivering, in technical language with the data behind it.
The intervention recommendations. What to address, in what order, with what approach, on what timeline. Specific. Sequenced. Costed at program budget level. Built to advance disclosure-defensible outcomes AND ecosystem function recovery.
The disclosure-cycle frame. What we expect to move between reporting events. What thresholds trigger material disclosure shifts. What the program trajectory looks like if performance tracks to projection. Set up so you can hold us, or your contractors, to predictions across every disclosure submission.
What Comes After
Once we know what's there, we can design for a deeper fix.
You move from Diagnose into Design. We take the lab results and the goals you defined and build a remediation plan specifically for your property. What to apply, when, in what order, and why.